FOR QUALITY WORK ON THESE INSTRUCTIONS CLICK ORDER NOW!

international trade

Learning Outcomes:
Knowledge

K1 : Clear understanding of the inter and intra industries
trade flows based on appropriate economic analysis.
K2: Critical understanding of alternative international
trading frameworks including regionalism, bilateralism
and multilaterism trading arrangements.
K3: Critical understanding of trade policies to enhance
export and innovation led growth and protectionist
policies.
K4: Critical understanding of international payment
mechanism, single currency, exchange rate
determination , volatility and impact on trade.

Skills
S1: To source, collect , analyse and present relevant
secondary international trade data to arrive at a
conclusion.
S2: Learning to work in small teams to communicate
effectively to present selected topics on international trade.

Assessment Criteria

Evidence of background reading including explanation and the use of theoretical contributions and relevance of the material to the question posed.

Appropriate use of Harvard Referencing system throughout the assignment.

Depth of analysis based on integration of relevant academic literature with supporting empirical evidence/data .

Appropriate conclusion based on relevant analysis and evidence.

Preparation Notes

Your assignment should include:

Explanation and applications of relevant international trade theories and literature to support discussion and analysis in all parts.

Collection, presentation and analysis of relevant international trade data using key data sources (for example: Eurostat, IMF, WTO) to provide empirical support to your discussion.

Integration of theoretical discussion with relevant evidence and data to arrive at an appropriate conclusion.

Guidance on submission .

Your submission must include a relevant Turnitin Report.

THE UNIVERSITY’S REGULATIONS CONCERNING CHEATING, COLLUSION AND PLAGIARISM APPLY TO THIS Assessment.

PGB M08 –International trade Assignment.

Word limit: 3000-3500 words (excluding charts, graphs and tables).

Answer All Questions :

Q.1 Choosing any NIC critically evaluate the role of innovation and research and development
expenditures in explaining the growth of exports and per capita income in that country over recent years.
Q.2
Critically examine the extent of intra –industry trade between the UK and the EU in recent years. Discuss the implications of your results for the UK external trade policy after the Brexit.

Q.3.
With reference to the theory of Optimum Currency Area (OCA) and relevant empirical indicators, critically examine whether the Eurozone is an optimum currency area. What are the implications of your analysis for the future of this trading area?

Generic Assessment Criteria – Postgraduate
Categories
Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis Argument and Structure Critical Evaluation Presentation Reference to Literature
Pass 86 –
100% The work examined is exemplary and provides clear evidence of a complete grasp of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also unequivocal evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be exemplary in all the categories cited above. It will demonstrate a particularly compelling evaluation, originality, and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse.
76-85% The work examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be excellent in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse and some evidence of originality.

70 –
75% The work examined is of a high standard and there is evidence of comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is clearly articulated evidence demonstrating that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are satisfied At this level it is expected that the standard of the work will be high in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse.

60 –
69% Directly relevant to the requirements of the assessment A substantial knowledge of relevant material, showing a clear grasp of themes, questions and issues therein Comprehensive analysis – clear and orderly presentation Well supported, focussed argument which is clear and logically structured. Contains distinctive or independent thinking; and begins to formulate an independent position in relation to theory and/or practice. Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style with acceptable format Critical appraisal of up-to- date and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives.
Very good use of a wide range of sophisticated source material.

50 –
59% Some attempt to address the requirements of the assessment: may drift away from this in less focused passages Adequate knowledge of a fair range of relevant material, with intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance Significant analytical treatment which has a clear purpose Generally coherent and logically structured, using an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical mode(s) May contain some distinctive or independent thinking; may begin to formulate an independent position in relation to theory and/or practice. Competently written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, with acceptable format Uses a good variety of literature which includes recent texts and/or appropriate literature, including a substantive amount beyond library texts. Competent use of source material.
40 –
49% Some correlation with the requirements of the assessment but there are instances of irrelevance Basic understanding of the subject but addressing a limited range of material Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks clear analytical purpose Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoretical mode(s) couched in simplistic terms Sound work which expresses a coherent position only in broad terms and in uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of the topic A simple basic style but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader Evidence of use of appropriate literature which goes beyond that referred to by the tutor. Frequently only uses a single source to support a point.
Fail 35 –
39% Relevance to the requirements of the assessment may be very intermittent, and may be reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms A limited understanding of a narrow range of material Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion and there may be a lack of clarity and coherence Some evidence of a view starting to be formed but mainly derivative. Numerous deficiencies in expression and presentation; the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic or repetitious style Barely adequate use of literature. Over reliance on
material provided by the tutor.
The evidence provided shows that the majority of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied – for compensation consideration.
Assignments – p. 9/10

30 –
34% The work examined provides insufficient evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence provided shows that some of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in some of the indicators.
15-29% The work examined is unacceptable and provides little evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence shows that few of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in several of the indicators.
0-14% The work examined is unacceptable and provides almost no evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence fails to show that any of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in the majority or all of the indicators.

 

FOR QUALITY WORK ON THESE INSTRUCTIONS CLICK ORDER NOW!