Adoption Plan Proposal Introduction: For this assessment you will read the attached case study,


Adoption Plan Proposal


For this assessment you will read the attached case study, which presents the existing technology and needs of a fictional organization. You will propose an emerging technology solution that will benefit the organization in the case study. You will need to discuss the impacts of this technology within the context of the organization.


Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A.  Summarize an organizational need in the case study, including the scope of the need.

B.  Propose an emerging technology solution to address the organizational need from the case study. Provide justification that classifies this technology as emerging.

C.  Outline an adoption process for the technology solution you plan to implement, using the risks and benefits of early adoption versus the risks and benefits of later adoption to justify your adoption timing.

D.  Describe potential positive and negative effects your technology solution could have on the people and current processes in the organization, providing examples for how to address any negative effects.

E.  Compare your technology solution to similar existing technology solutions, including details that qualify how your chosen technology better supports the organization’s mission, goals, and vision.

F.  Propose methods for measuring the impact of the technology, including specific metrics that would support whether the adoption is successful or unsuccessful.

G.  Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

H.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
TechFite Case Study

TechFite makes medical devices for the space program. They are in Houston, Texas, near the Johnson Space Center. Security is a top priority for TechFite, partly because the company works with NASA, but also because the proprietary technology that TechFite is creating allows humans to work longer in space. TechFite has an IT department that currently consists of 4 employees: two entry-level specialists, a senior security specialist, and an IT security manager.
TechFite has a two-firewall system in which the outside firewall protects TechFite and its partners and the inner firewall protects the TechFite intranet.
The two-firewall system creates a three-ring network where the innermost ring is the most secure and the outermost ring connects directly to the Internet. Each one of these firewalls creates a log of all the network traffic that passes through each of the firewalls. The TechFite CIO has notably raised concerns about current infrastructure security implications, but she wants her staff to propose inexpensive solutions to meet future demands. There is a lot of traffic that passes through these firewalls due to companies that want to securely collaborate with TechFite and the need government agencies have to access TechFite’s information. TechFite administrators have been researching solutions currently available to meet the growing demands of secure collaboration, and all suggested resources fall outside of TechFite’s IT budget of $250k per year, which also includes staff wages. Additionally, it is difficult to scan these logs manually, and TechFite has been exploring open source solutions to automate log correlation for both host-based and network appliances. However, the amount of storage space to keep these logs for at least a year is more than TechFite has onsite. One of the system administrators suggested using technology to not only review the logs but also store the log files.
TechFite is being pressured to comply with FISMA, using NIST as a security framework, when the company works on government contracts. Other restrictions have been observed by TechFite’s competitors concerning the handling of data across international boundaries, namely in the European Union. The company is also being asked to ensure FISMA compliance, even as budgets are shrinking, which is happening in part because there are fewer space missions planned. TechFite is also looking to work with the space programs of other countries, such as the European Space Agency, the Canadian Space Agency, and JAXA, the Japanese space agency. The company is interested in collaborating with other institutions and companies to expand its business, which may result in opening subsidiaries in other locations domestically and overseas. This may force the company to store its information for longer periods of time, and more locations means more log data will need to be stored.
Besides scanning the log data for potential attackers after systems have been compromised, the system administrators would like to be alerted by a new system that meets FISMA regulations when potential attacks are occurring on host and network systems. This means that real-time log scanning and behavior analysis of incoming network traffic will be needed to determine when a denial of service attack or advanced persistent threat is happening so the system administrators can catch the hackers. The system administrators also want to install honeypots to attract hackers, and the logs for those will also need to be stored even though these honeypots will not actually have real data on them.
The system administrators will be busy keeping up with the technology they have, and they will not have time to research new technologies that might help them do their jobs better.